Models
Visible Alpha broker models via S&P Xpressfeed · 8 brokers · 306 line items · freshest revision 2026-06-11.
Broker models cast TOWR as a mature Indonesian tower operator: near-consensus on the headline P&L, with revenue holding around Rp13.3T and EBITDA flat near Rp11T through FY-2028. The debate is not the top line but the mix and the cash: non-tower revenue is now the faster-growing ~40% of sales, tower-leasing KPIs are decelerating, and brokers split widely on capex, free cash flow and the dividend. Forward coverage thins sharply, from eight brokers in FY-2025 to two-to-three thereafter.
Non-tower revenue is the modeled swing factor as tower leasing flattens near Rp8.4T
Only two brokers split tower from non-tower, so treat the mix as indicative. On those models tower leasing is roughly flat around Rp8.4T while non-tower revenue compounds in the mid-single digits, making it the marginal driver of total growth.
| Line | FY-2025A | FY-2026E | FY-2027E | FY-2028E | YoY | Brokers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | Rp13,328.62bn | Rp13,845.45bn | Rp14,146.75bn | Rp14,460.88bn | +3.9% | 8 |
| Revenue - tower | Rp9,105.16bn | Rp8,354.35bn | Rp8,449.27bn | Rp8,559.71bn | -8.2% | 6 |
| Revenue - non tower | — | Rp5,511.86bn | Rp5,720.18bn | Rp5,901.17bn | — | 2 |
Tenant growth decelerates and the tenancy ratio plateaus near 1.66
Ending tenants step up in FY-2026 then flatten toward 63,000, with the tenancy ratio settling around 1.66 and annualised revenue per tenant broadly flat near Rp230M. Growth increasingly leans on colocations onto existing sites rather than new-site builds.
| Line | FY-2025A | FY-2026E | FY-2027E | FY-2028E | YoY | Brokers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Ending tenants(#) | 58,339 Number | 61,457 Number | 62,630 Number | 63,000 Number | +5.3% | 8 |
| Ending sites(#) | 36,238 Number | 36,897 Number | 37,530 Number | 37,997 Number | +1.8% | 8 |
| Utilisation | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tenancy ratio(#) | 1.60 Number | 1.66 Number | 1.67 Number | 1.65 Number | +3.9% | 7 |
| Volume | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net adds-tenant(#) | 716.6 Number | 1,375 Number | 1,173 Number | 1,075 Number | +91.9% | 5 |
| Unit economics | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Revenue per tenant-Annualised | Rp229.88m | Rp226.97m | Rp228.02m | Rp231.45m | -1.3% | 8 |
EBITDA holds near Rp11T while easing capex funds a step-up in the dividend
EBITDA is modeled essentially flat around Rp11T. With capital expenditure easing from above Rp5T toward the low Rp4T range, brokers carry EPS drifting up toward Rp72 and a dividend that steps up from roughly Rp20 to Rp24 per share.
| Line | FY-2025A | FY-2026E | FY-2027E | FY-2028E | YoY | Brokers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBITDA | Rp11,125.96bn | Rp11,093.50bn | Rp11,315.38bn | Rp11,453.08bn | -0.3% | 8 |
| Capital expenditure | Rp5,150.78bn | Rp4,464.77bn | Rp4,314.32bn | Rp4,617.35bn | -13.3% | 6 |
| EPS-Diluted(IDR) | Rp65.47 | Rp66.63 | Rp69.25 | Rp71.59 | +1.8% | 8 |
| Dividend per share(IDR) | Rp20.02 | Rp23.71 | Rp23.57 | Rp23.34 | +18.4% | 8 |
Consensus is tight on revenue but splits widely on capex, free cash flow and payout
Revenue and EBITDA sit inside a narrow band, but the models diverge on how much TOWR invests and returns. Capex, free cash flow and the dividend show the widest FY-2025 dispersion despite eight-broker coverage.
| Line | Period | Median | Q1–Q3 | Min–max | Brokers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital expenditure | FY-2025A | Rp5,367.07bn | Rp4,172.78bn–Rp6,513.47bn | Rp2,562.13bn–Rp6,938.13bn | 6 |
| Free cash flow (FCF) | FY-2025A | Rp2,666.30bn | Rp1,944.83bn–Rp5,462.12bn | Rp-511.31bn–Rp6,692.84bn | 6 |
| Dividend per share(IDR) | FY-2025A | Rp20.56 | Rp15.97–Rp22.21 | Rp13.82–Rp27.17 | 8 |
| Net adds-sites(#) | FY-2025A | 928.0 Number | 617.0 Number–1,425 Number | 400.0 Number–2,440 Number | 8 |
Forward coverage thins to two-to-three brokers; the revenue split rests on two
Eight brokers model FY-2025, but only two to three carry FY-2026 through FY-2028. The tower/non-tower split, colocation counts and free cash flow rest on one or two models, so read forward-year and segment figures as thin rather than settled consensus.
Headline P&L consensus, momentum and beat/miss live in the CapIQ tab.